On June 3, 2013 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in
Maryland v. King (12-207) that “When officers make an arrest supported by
probable cause to hold for a serious offense and they bring the suspect to the
station to be detained in custody, taking and analyzing a cheek swab of the
arrestee’s DNA is, like fingerprinting and photographing, a legitimate police
booking procedure that is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.” (at 28)
The
5-4 majority opinion of the Court was delivered by Justice Kennedy and joined by
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito and Breyer. Justice Scalia
filed a dissenting opinion joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor and
Kagan.
It is the opinion of the majority, as is evidenced above, that upon arrest we have not 4th Amendment right (against search and seizure) to prevent DNA testing.
In the dissent (written by Scalia) he stated:
"The most regrettable aspect
of the suspicionless search that occurred here is that it proved to be
quite unnecessary. All parties concede that it would have been entirely
permissible, as far as the Fourth Amendment is concerned, for Maryland
to take a sample of King’s DNA as a consequence of his conviction for
second-degree assault. So the ironic result of the Court’s error is
this: The only arrestees to whom the outcome here will ever make a
difference are those who have been acquitted of the crime of arrest (so
that their DNA could not have been taken upon conviction). In other
words, this Act manages to burden uniquely the sole group for whom the
Fourth Amendment’s protections ought to be most jealously guarded: people who are innocent of the State’s accusations."
Scalia concluded stating:
“ ... I doubt that the proud men who wrote the charter of our liberties would have
been so eager to open their mouths for royal inspection. I therefore dissent,
and hope that today’s incursion upon the Fourth Amendment, like an earlier one,
will some day be repudiated.”
The link to the case can be found here. If you have been arrested in Miami-Dade, Palm Beach or Broward County, you can find your attorney here.
No comments:
Post a Comment